Berlin Psychoanalytic
Berlin Psychoanalytic
  • 87
  • 546 902
2. Lacan's intellectual influences - Dr. Nicolás Lorenzini
Second video on the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. This time we will review his intellectual context and background, which will inform much of his theoretical and clinical work.
To help us produce more videos like this, do support us through our Patreon page: www.patreon.com/berlinpsychoanalytic
Psychoanalysis should be free! From this motto, we're looking at making the insights of more than a century of psychoanalytic understanding available to everyone and everywhere.
Переглядів: 1 804

Відео

Live Q&A on Narcissism, May 5th, 2023, 6 p.m. (CET)
Переглядів 475Рік тому
Berlin Psychoanalytic invites you to a live Q&A on UA-cam, where we'll be delving into the complexities of narcissism, an important concept in psychoanalysis and a frequent term in contemporary society. Through a psychoanalytic lens, we'll explore and discuss some of its meanings, both theoretical and clinical! 🧠✨ 🗓️ Date: Friday, 5th May 🕕 Time: 18:00 📍 Where: Live here on UA-cam channel Pleas...
1. Jacques Lacan: An introduction - Dr Nicolás Lorenzini
Переглядів 2,7 тис.Рік тому
First video of a series on the controversial French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. This intruduction aims at giving an account of the controversies that surrounded his life and work. To help us produce more videos like this, do support us through our Patreon page: www.patreon.com/berlinpsychoanalytic Psychoanalysis should be free! From this motto, we're looking at making the insights of more than...
Peter Fonagy in Conversation with Berlin Psychoanalytic
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
Join us as we sat down with distinguished psychologist and psychoanalyst, Professor Peter Fonagy, in an exclusive interview brought to you by Berlin Psychoanalytic. Professor Fonagy is a highly renowned figure in the field of psychoanalysis and heads the Division of Psychology and Language Sciences at University College London, as well as serving as the Chief Executive of the Anna Freud Nationa...
2nd Sneak peek of Peter Fonagy in conversation with Berlin Psychoanalytic
Переглядів 297Рік тому
Discover the origins of mentalization-based treatment and how it evolved from Peter Fonagy's personal experiences working with borderline patients. In this exclusive sneak peek from our upcoming interview, Fonagy shares insights into his journey as a junior analyst and the role peer supervision played in shaping his approach to therapy. Tune in to the full interview to gain new insights into th...
Teaser - Peter Fonagy in conversation with Berlin Psychoanalytic
Переглядів 526Рік тому
In this sneak peek from Berlin Psychoanalytic's conversation with Professor Peter Fonagy, we learn about Fonagy's clinical practice and how his early personal analysis influenced the way he approaches his clients in therapy. In the full-length interview, we delve into Peter Fonagy's perspectives on contemporary psychoanalysis, mentalization, his personal experiences with psychoanalytic training...
The psychology of conscience with Sean McGrath & Donald Carveth
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
What’s the role of conscience, ethics, and morals in psychological development and individuation? To investigate this question Berlin Psychoanalytic invited again the Toronto-based psychoanalyst Donald Carveth and Philosophy & Theology professor Sean J. McGrath for a conversation. As a base for our discussion, we have read the important 1958 Jung essay ‘A psychological view of conscience’. You ...
Live Hangout on Friday 3rd of June at 3:30 P.M. (Berlin Time)
Переглядів 2832 роки тому
On Friday the 3rd of June at 3:30 pm, Berlin Psychoanalytic is hosting another live hangout! Be sure to join and hang out and talk psychoanalysis! The link to the live stream will be posted 15 minutes before we go live. See you there!
Live Q&A I 8th of April 2022
Переглядів 2,2 тис.2 роки тому
On Friday the 8th of April 2022, Berlin Psychoanalytic hosted its very first live Q&A for all supporters on Patreon.
Live Q&A for supporters on Patreon | 8th of April
Переглядів 2832 роки тому
Supporters on Patreon are invited to an exclusive live Q&A to celebrate the launch of our new membership options! The live stream will take place on Friday the 8th of April at 4 pm (CET). Write your questions about psychoanalysis in the comments or share them in the chat during the live stream if you're a patron. If you want to join the live stream Q&A and receive exclusive BP merch, visit our ...
Drives part 1 - Freud's Drive Theory
Переглядів 10 тис.2 роки тому
We continue by opening up a new series on Drives. The first video features Aleksandar Dimitrijevic discussing Freud's Drive Theory. To help us produce more videos like this, do support us through our Patreon page: www.patreon.com/berlinpsychoanalytic Psychoanalysis should be free! From this motto, we're looking at making the insights of more than a century of psychoanalytic understanding availa...
Therapeutic Relationship Part 4 - What do we actually mean by 'Therapeutic Relationship'
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
In the fourth video in Berlin Psychoanalytic’s series on the Therapeutic Relationship, Aleksandar Dimitrijevic provides an overview of what is actually meant by 'therapeutic relationship'. To help us produce more videos like this, do support us through our Patreon page: www.patreon.com/berlinpsychoanalytic Psychoanalysis should be free! From this motto, we're looking at making the insights of m...
C.G Jung's early vision for psychoanalysis | A letter to Freud
Переглядів 1,4 тис.2 роки тому
C.G Jung's early vision for psychoanalysis | A letter to Freud
The therapeutic Relationship - 3. Boundary Violations
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
The therapeutic Relationship - 3. Boundary Violations
The Therapeutic Relationship - Part 2. Interpersonal Approach(es)
Переглядів 4,2 тис.2 роки тому
The Therapeutic Relationship - Part 2. Interpersonal Approach(es)
Therapists for Ukraine | A call for support
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 роки тому
Therapists for Ukraine | A call for support
The therapeutic relationship - Part 1. The classical model
Переглядів 4,3 тис.2 роки тому
The therapeutic relationship - Part 1. The classical model
Psychoanalytic Book Recommendations
Переглядів 3,5 тис.2 роки тому
Psychoanalytic Book Recommendations
A discussion on psychoanalytic training
Переглядів 4 тис.2 роки тому
A discussion on psychoanalytic training
Resistance in psychotherapy - 5. Acting out
Переглядів 5 тис.2 роки тому
Resistance in psychotherapy - 5. Acting out
Resistance in Psychotherapy - 4. Therapist's Silence
Переглядів 4,9 тис.2 роки тому
Resistance in Psychotherapy - 4. Therapist's Silence
Conscience, Superego & God | Berlin Psychoanalytic in conversation with Donald Carveth
Переглядів 7 тис.2 роки тому
Conscience, Superego & God | Berlin Psychoanalytic in conversation with Donald Carveth
Resistance in psychotherapy - 3. Silence - Dr Aleksandar Dimitrijevic
Переглядів 4,1 тис.2 роки тому
Resistance in psychotherapy - 3. Silence - Dr Aleksandar Dimitrijevic
Resistance in psychotherapy - 2. Money - Dr Aleksandar Dimitrijevic
Переглядів 4,2 тис.2 роки тому
Resistance in psychotherapy - 2. Money - Dr Aleksandar Dimitrijevic
Resistance in psychotherapy - Dr. Aleksandar Dimitrijević
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
Resistance in psychotherapy - Dr. Aleksandar Dimitrijević
Freud's "Mourning and Melancholia" - Dr. Rodrigo Sanchez Escandón
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
Freud's "Mourning and Melancholia" - Dr. Rodrigo Sanchez Escandón
Attachment 10.- Fathers. Dr. Aleksandar Dimitrijević
Переглядів 1,8 тис.2 роки тому
Attachment 10.- Fathers. Dr. Aleksandar Dimitrijević
Bion 3. - A theory of thinking
Переглядів 10 тис.3 роки тому
Bion 3. - A theory of thinking
Bion 2. - The work with groups HD 1080p
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
Bion 2. - The work with groups HD 1080p
Bion 1. - An introduction to his life and ideas HD 1080p
Переглядів 11 тис.3 роки тому
Bion 1. - An introduction to his life and ideas HD 1080p

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @user-wh5mr4tr8u
    @user-wh5mr4tr8u 6 днів тому

    So basically those European colonising Africa, usa and Australia was the crazy ones they kicked out 😂seems likely wonder if craziness is just higher IQ then average

  • @willieluncheonette5843
    @willieluncheonette5843 18 днів тому

    ". Psychoanalysis is a futile exercise because it changes nothing: it does not create a new man, it does not bring peace to you. In fact even the founders of psychoanalysis like Sigmund Freud were so much afraid of death that you cannot believe it. No normal being is so afraid of death. The founder of psychoanalysis was so afraid that even the word “death” was not to be pronounced in front of him - it was taboo. It was not to be talked about. Three times it had happened that somebody mentioned death and Sigmund Freud fell in a swoon, in a fit, became unconscious. He was so afraid of death that he avoided going to any cemetery, he avoided going to anybody who was dying, even a friend or disciple. Wherever there was anything concerning death he was absolutely panicked - and this man gives you psychoanalysis! His problems are not solved. He gets angry just like anybody else. He is jealous, more jealous than anybody else. He is greedy. He wants to monopolize, he wants to dominate people. He creates almost an empire of psychoanalysts around the world, but everybody has to repeat like parrots whatever he says. Anybody who says anything different is immediately expelled. It seems it is not science but a political party or a fanatic religion - not scientific research. And the same is true about Jung. Jung came to India to meet someone… because in the East people have been working on the mind for thousands of years. But they have never developed anything like psychoanalysis; they developed meditation - a totally different approach. What is the use of analyzing the rubbish of the mind? - sorting it out… it takes years. There are people who have been in psychoanalysis for fifteen years and they have reached nowhere. They have changed their psychoanalyst in the hope that perhaps somebody else will help, but they have not reached anywhere else. They cannot, because all that psychoanalysis does - all the schools, whether Adlerian or Jungian or Freudian - is to sort out the rubbish of your mind, interpret it according to their minds. And what is the point of it all? In the East we have not developed psychoanalysis, we have developed meditation. Meditation simply takes you away from the garbage, takes you beyond the garbage - it is not worth bothering about. And if you want to bother about it you can go on bothering for lives. You will not come to an end. But just being a witness to your mind, without doing anything to the mind - just being aloof, just seeing it as if thoughts are moving on a screen and simply watching it without any judgment of good and bad - a strange experience happens: thoughts slowly start disappearing. Soon a moment comes when there is only an empty screen - no thoughts. And when there is no object, no thought for your consciousness, it turns back upon itself because there is nothing preventing it; that is exactly the meaning of the word ‘object’ - it prevents, it objects. When there is no object the consciousness goes… and just as everything moves in circles in existence, consciousness also moves in a circle. It comes back upon its own source. And the meeting of the consciousness with its own source is the explosion of light, the greatest celebration that a man is capable of, the greatest orgasmic experience. And it is not something that happens and is finished. No, once it has happened, it continues. It remains with you. It becomes almost like your breathing. You live in it twenty-four hours a day. Jung had come to India in search of someone, to find out what the East has done to create so many people like Gautam Buddha - not one but hundreds who have gone beyond mind and all its troubles and problems, worries, anxieties. What is the secret? He was going to universities, meeting psychoanalysts, and everywhere he was told, “You are wasting your time. These people are not the right people. These people have gone to the West to learn psychoanalysis and they are teaching psychoanalysis in the universities. You have come to search and seek somebody who is absolutely untouched by the West. And there is a man.” And there was a man - Shri Raman Maharshi. Wherever Jung went - and he was there for three months - everywhere the same name was given to him. “Go to Arunachal in South India and meet this man who is uneducated, who knows nothing of psychoanalysis; he is the man the East has been able to produce. Just go and sit with him and talk with him and listen to him. If you have some questions, ask him.” But you will be surprised: Jung never went there. And later on, feeling that he will be criticized, Jung wrote, “I consideredly did not go to Raman Maharshi because the East has its own way, the West has its own way, and they should not be mixed” - just to protect himself from criticism. Then why did he go to India at all? He was told again and again to go to a man who was available, which is rare, and he did not go there, although he went up to Madras, from where it was only a two hour journey to Arunachal! Jung did not go to the man, whom just by meeting he would have seen how a clear man is, how a man is who has cleaned his mind completely - his eyes, his gestures, his words, his authority. He does not quote scriptures, he knows himself. Jung did not go there, and he himself felt guilty. To defend himself he started writing that the East and the West have different ways. This is nonsense, because man - whether in the East or in the West - is the same. And it is strange that he was teaching Eastern students Western psychology. He should have refused because this is mixing East and West. If he was really honest then he should have said, “You go back to the East.” He was teaching Eastern students Western psychology, but he was not ready to go to an Eastern meditator, just to meet him. What is the fear? The fear is that Jung is as normal a person as you are - just knowledgeable. He has gathered from books, but he has no authentic experience of his own. Western psychoanalysis is just a business. It is cheating people. It is simply exploiting people without any help, and because there is no other alternative people have to go to it. The psychoanalysts themselves go to other psychoanalysts. And psychoanalysts go mad more than any other profession! They commit suicide more than any other profession; they are more perverted in every way than any other profession."

  • @willieluncheonette5843
    @willieluncheonette5843 18 днів тому

    " . Psychoanalysis is a futile exercise because it changes nothing: it does not create a new man, it does not bring peace to you. In fact even the founders of psychoanalysis like Sigmund Freud were so much afraid of death that you cannot believe it. No normal being is so afraid of death. The founder of psychoanalysis was so afraid that even the word “death” was not to be pronounced in front of him - it was taboo. It was not to be talked about. Three times it had happened that somebody mentioned death and Sigmund Freud fell in a swoon, in a fit, became unconscious. He was so afraid of death that he avoided going to any cemetery, he avoided going to anybody who was dying, even a friend or disciple. Wherever there was anything concerning death he was absolutely panicked - and this man gives you psychoanalysis! His problems are not solved. He gets angry just like anybody else. He is jealous, more jealous than anybody else. He is greedy. He wants to monopolize, he wants to dominate people. He creates almost an empire of psychoanalysts around the world, but everybody has to repeat like parrots whatever he says. Anybody who says anything different is immediately expelled. It seems it is not science but a political party or a fanatic religion - not scientific research. And the same is true about Jung. Jung came to India to meet someone… because in the East people have been working on the mind for thousands of years. But they have never developed anything like psychoanalysis; they developed meditation - a totally different approach. What is the use of analyzing the rubbish of the mind? - sorting it out… it takes years. There are people who have been in psychoanalysis for fifteen years and they have reached nowhere. They have changed their psychoanalyst in the hope that perhaps somebody else will help, but they have not reached anywhere else. They cannot, because all that psychoanalysis does - all the schools, whether Adlerian or Jungian or Freudian - is to sort out the rubbish of your mind, interpret it according to their minds. And what is the point of it all? In the East we have not developed psychoanalysis, we have developed meditation. Meditation simply takes you away from the garbage, takes you beyond the garbage - it is not worth bothering about. And if you want to bother about it you can go on bothering for lives. You will not come to an end. But just being a witness to your mind, without doing anything to the mind - just being aloof, just seeing it as if thoughts are moving on a screen and simply watching it without any judgment of good and bad - a strange experience happens: thoughts slowly start disappearing. Soon a moment comes when there is only an empty screen - no thoughts. And when there is no object, no thought for your consciousness, it turns back upon itself because there is nothing preventing it; that is exactly the meaning of the word ‘object’ - it prevents, it objects. When there is no object the consciousness goes… and just as everything moves in circles in existence, consciousness also moves in a circle. It comes back upon its own source. And the meeting of the consciousness with its own source is the explosion of light, the greatest celebration that a man is capable of, the greatest orgasmic experience. And it is not something that happens and is finished. No, once it has happened, it continues. It remains with you. It becomes almost like your breathing. You live in it twenty-four hours a day. Jung had come to India in search of someone, to find out what the East has done to create so many people like Gautam Buddha - not one but hundreds who have gone beyond mind and all its troubles and problems, worries, anxieties. What is the secret? He was going to universities, meeting psychoanalysts, and everywhere he was told, “You are wasting your time. These people are not the right people. These people have gone to the West to learn psychoanalysis and they are teaching psychoanalysis in the universities. You have come to search and seek somebody who is absolutely untouched by the West. And there is a man.” And there was a man - Shri Raman Maharshi. Wherever Jung went - and he was there for three months - everywhere the same name was given to him. “Go to Arunachal in South India and meet this man who is uneducated, who knows nothing of psychoanalysis; he is the man the East has been able to produce. Just go and sit with him and talk with him and listen to him. If you have some questions, ask him.” But you will be surprised: Jung never went there. And later on, feeling that he will be criticized, Jung wrote, “I consideredly did not go to Raman Maharshi because the East has its own way, the West has its own way, and they should not be mixed” - just to protect himself from criticism. Then why did he go to India at all? He was told again and again to go to a man who was available, which is rare, and he did not go there, although he went up to Madras, from where it was only a two hour journey to Arunachal! Jung did not go to the man, whom just by meeting he would have seen how a clear man is, how a man is who has cleaned his mind completely - his eyes, his gestures, his words, his authority. He does not quote scriptures, he knows himself. Jung did not go there, and he himself felt guilty. To defend himself he started writing that the East and the West have different ways. This is nonsense, because man - whether in the East or in the West - is the same. And it is strange that he was teaching Eastern students Western psychology. He should have refused because this is mixing East and West. If he was really honest then he should have said, “You go back to the East.” He was teaching Eastern students Western psychology, but he was not ready to go to an Eastern meditator, just to meet him. What is the fear? The fear is that Jung is as normal a person as you are - just knowledgeable. He has gathered from books, but he has no authentic experience of his own. Western psychoanalysis is just a business. It is cheating people. It is simply exploiting people without any help, and because there is no other alternative people have to go to it. The psychoanalysts themselves go to other psychoanalysts. And psychoanalysts go mad more than any other profession! They commit suicide more than any other profession; they are more perverted in every way than any other profession."

  • @JohnSWren
    @JohnSWren 22 дні тому

    Robert Langs?

  • @sizesmall1756
    @sizesmall1756 24 дні тому

    So according to this theory, the child of a very caring and devoted mother would be more prone to becoming a narcissist, and the child of a neglectful mother would be more prone to developing empathy ?

  • @richardprice9730
    @richardprice9730 25 днів тому

    Brilliant at last a glimmer of hope for psychoanalysis, a movement in a truly honest, open and potentially intimate encounter with lasting usefull insight it might bring. Yes also a bridge to other forms of psychotherapy, Rogerian, Group work much more useful to patients in the real world away from the couch.

  • @pablomedinadiaz1795
    @pablomedinadiaz1795 26 днів тому

    Muchas gracias Nicolas ❣

  • @aytys013
    @aytys013 27 днів тому

    Great video! Very stoked for the next video on the mirror stage!

  • @fneedler
    @fneedler 28 днів тому

    thank you for the directions

  • @mrsmrs1200
    @mrsmrs1200 29 днів тому

    Odlično obradjena tema. Hvala

  • @freydel0411
    @freydel0411 Місяць тому

    Perfect explanation, thanks ❤

  • @JD-td8kl
    @JD-td8kl Місяць тому

    Please resurrect this channel!

  • @michaelkulyk
    @michaelkulyk Місяць тому

    Thanks for this wonderful introduction.

  • @HMBJJ
    @HMBJJ Місяць тому

    did he ever make a 3rd part?

  • @xxxdftkkhgdrujj
    @xxxdftkkhgdrujj 2 місяці тому

    Freud the Idiot

  • @lrod20101
    @lrod20101 2 місяці тому

    The information is so good but I will admit Im struggling with the English. My Father had a heavy accent and I still find it difficult to focus and follow. Too bad..

  • @user-tv3lq1ey9u
    @user-tv3lq1ey9u 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for this excellent video.

  • @user-tv3lq1ey9u
    @user-tv3lq1ey9u 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for your offering such an excellent presentation of this vast subject.

  • @doodleroberts
    @doodleroberts 2 місяці тому

    I love this

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 3 місяці тому

    Is there a written test that evaluates delusional thinking? I believe that such a test with a rating score must be taken before a psychoanalyst accepts new patients or analysands. Those who have delusional thinking will not progress easily in psychoanalysis.

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 3 місяці тому

    I, personally, believe the death drive is superfluous.

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 3 місяці тому

    I've followed my dreams since my early twenties. They've helped me understand myself.

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 3 місяці тому

    This series is my favorite to watch on this important topic.

  • @RobWalker1
    @RobWalker1 3 місяці тому

    hi! Is there a reason why you guys stopped uploading? I really enjoyed your work!

  • @endegenabekele9989
    @endegenabekele9989 3 місяці тому

    Amazing

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 4 місяці тому

    This technique seems better than "free associating."

  • @luc4lvar3s30
    @luc4lvar3s30 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for your teaching!

  • @michaelvenne9386
    @michaelvenne9386 5 місяців тому

    Very strong video. You are breaking the curse that people put on it.

  • @poochini7272
    @poochini7272 5 місяців тому

    This presenter is excellent. Learned a lot. Ty.

  • @adamcullen8777
    @adamcullen8777 5 місяців тому

    He is so clear and relays the concepts so well. I always enjoy and learn from his videos. I wish there was information about how to not feel overwhelmed by the counter-transference or how to use it ethically (my grad program said not to talk about yourself, your feelings, etc..).

  • @ddee9612
    @ddee9612 5 місяців тому

    Explained beautifully but we need more of it . More depth.

  • @unusualpond
    @unusualpond 5 місяців тому

    Truly excellent. Thank you so much for this.

  • @drumdrum2012
    @drumdrum2012 5 місяців тому

    Out of a lot of stuff on youtube around these of topics psychoanalytic therapy and theory, I find yours the most accessable and well explained, even the more complex themes. Thank you. Really helping me in my training.

  • @charlesamrhein1292
    @charlesamrhein1292 5 місяців тому

    wow, I'm fairly familiar with sexual boundary violations in the history of our craft . but your presentation is unique, beyond what I imagined anyone would produce outside of a book. amazing and well done, this is a vital contribution to our history, thank you.

  • @jackwilliamatkins5602
    @jackwilliamatkins5602 5 місяців тому

    Live with Jesus Christ $1000 pw

  • @jackwilliamatkins5602
    @jackwilliamatkins5602 5 місяців тому

    Frivolous treatment

  • @chinmaybhat99
    @chinmaybhat99 5 місяців тому

    This is so interesting! Couldn't find the second part. Would be very grateful if you can upload. Thanks

  • @charlesamrhein1292
    @charlesamrhein1292 6 місяців тому

    OBG-13 -- he said that that is not relevant to psychoanalysis, but I think Peter would recognize the truth that, obstetrics and birth is very relevant to psychoanalysis.

  • @annenicholsonmbtp
    @annenicholsonmbtp 6 місяців тому

    I would love to hear a conversation between you and Byung-Chul Han whom I believe is also in Berlin ua-cam.com/video/bNkDeUApreo/v-deo.htmlsi=X2eVSW-ZkSla8Yf9

  • @gmabreak2864
    @gmabreak2864 6 місяців тому

    What about Dr. Edmund Bergler,s books ?

  • @iamaliveyoucantstopnow
    @iamaliveyoucantstopnow 6 місяців тому

    🥱

  • @dipankarmallick5543
    @dipankarmallick5543 6 місяців тому

    only patients dream...not the other beings...

  • @vudoomunkyfut
    @vudoomunkyfut 7 місяців тому

    "The first scientific psychologically theory..." It is not. Perhaps, In the West or within what we now construct as modernity need be added.

  • @user-fk8rb8ue5h
    @user-fk8rb8ue5h 7 місяців тому

    3 to 4 to 5 sessions a week. Talk about a moneymaking racket because that's all it is.

    • @hassegawamkt
      @hassegawamkt 7 місяців тому

      I do one session a week and I love it

  • @slickerdrips1984
    @slickerdrips1984 7 місяців тому

    Psychoanalysis has no scientific basis. Imagining how the psyche works and instantly believint it is not science. Doesn't matter how many books are written and how many followers it has, that doesn't make it more evidence based. Not only the basis of psychoanalysis are terribly biased when it comes to gender and culture and then generalized as rules, but it is well known that freud manipulated his narrative of his cases to fit into the nonesense that was his theory. No one really got cured from his interventions and his "analysis" was speculation over speculation. Any modern psychoanalysis is still developed and constructed on a basis of nothing, so still doesn't work.

    • @slickerdrips1984
      @slickerdrips1984 7 місяців тому

      Real studies can't be done when the theory's constructs can not be operationalized and observed. Doing the therapy and then seeing how the patient feels after is not a randomized double blind control study, it is a survey. When your constructs are not observable, anything else in the environment or situation can be the thing working. Someone can just feel good that they talked to someone or that they had an insight. That's not the effectiveness of a treatment, nor the proof that a theory is solid.

  • @psychotherapyinschoolsltd9160
    @psychotherapyinschoolsltd9160 8 місяців тому

    The location of Northfield Hospital was not London, but Birmingham.

  • @Ibisco-Lavier
    @Ibisco-Lavier 8 місяців тому

    Lacan have nothing freudian and was kicked out by the psychoanalitic movement. Why he is still considered a psychoanalist?

  • @davidnjohn
    @davidnjohn 8 місяців тому

    I was surprised and delighted to hear about Prof Carveth talking about his faith. I was smiling with recognition as he talked about a Christian beginning followed by an enthusiastic atheism and a return to faith. Very recognisable and great to identify with him in this journey. Thank you. His view on Freud as someone who saw animal-like destructiveness in the heart of the human condition is surprising but seems accurate. His notion of Conscience as ethical reminds me CS Lewis talking about evidence of God as innate to the human condition.

  • @user-xs3cd3yv2b
    @user-xs3cd3yv2b 9 місяців тому

    I’m just wondering if the topic about self analysis how you didn’t mention Karen Horney , her thoughts and ideas about self analysis and Psychoanalysis were very different from what you said and might be the opposite too as I understand